Official public register
Employment tribunal decisions
Search 133,515 published decision by employer, claimant or case number. Each result links to the official judgment on GOV.UK, and to a free company check on the employer.
Most recently published
- Ms D Bhowmick -Simpson and Ms F Ferguson v Secretary of State for Justice: 3300929/2024 and Others
4 August 2026 · Case 3300929/2024 and Others
Age discrimination · Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Race discrimination · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Miss C Lowe and Others v Talent84 Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation): 2500993/2025 and Others
31 July 2026 · Case 2500993/2025 and Others
Protective award · Redundancy
- A Plewik v Apple Clean Facilities Ltd: 3313664/2022
30 June 2026 · Case 3313664/2022
Contract of employment · Written pay statement
- Mr C Moloney v NetApp UK Ltd: 6002166/2025
9 July 2026 · Case 6002166/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr M Turner v ITEC Training Solutions Ltd: 1603349/2025
28 April 2026 · Case 1603349/2025
Unfair dismissal
- D Arthur v Newbold Solicitors: 6016923/2025
2 June 2026 · Case 6016923/2025
Disability discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Mr A Kamal v Safran Seats GB Wales: 6033586/2025
19 June 2026 · Case 6033586/2025
Age discrimination · Disability discrimination · Race discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Mr P Wendolowski v DHL E-Commerce UK Ltd and Others: 1600421/2025
14 April 2026 · Case 1600421/2025
Breach of contract · Whistleblowing · Race discrimination · Redundancy · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr J Maalo v West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust: 6022815/2025
10 July 2026 · Case 6022815/2025
Age discrimination · Race discrimination
- Mr L T Breda de Moraes and Mr G Munro-Henworth v Cambridge City Council: 3312985/2021 and 3312986/2021
28 May 2025 · Case 3312985/2021 and 3312986/2021
Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal
- Mr M A C Terron v China Unicom (Europe) Operations Ltd: 6008481/2024 and 6008316/2024
18 September 2024 · Case 6008481/2024 and 6008316/2024
Disability discrimination · Interim relief · Working time regulations
- Ms L Hugh v Tesco Stores Ltd: 6023889/2025
8 June 2026 · Case 6023889/2025
Working time regulations
- G Finch v J Wood: 6033464/2025
7 August 2026 · Case 6033464/2025
Breach of contract · Whistleblowing · Religion or belief discrimination · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr M Suttner v Broadstone PAC LLP: 6022107/2024
29 July 2026 · Case 6022107/2024
Whistleblowing
- Miss E Carpenter v Dr J Veende: 6001462/2024
6 August 2026 · Case 6001462/2024
Redundancy
- Mrs N Lupton v Ciarajade Hair Salon Ltd: 6038817/2025
1 May 2026 · Case 6038817/2025
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Ms A v Your Path Ltd and Others: 6008285/2024
23 July 2026 · Case 6008285/2024
Sex discrimination · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Miss N Ramzan v Aneurin Bevan University Local Health Board: 1602961/2025
15 May 2026 · Case 1602961/2025
Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mrs S Pillai v Barts Health NHS Trust: 3201249/2024
4 February 2025 · Case 3201249/2024
Disability discrimination · Race discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Mr B Jawneh v G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Ltd: 1401260/2025
16 July 2026 · Case 1401260/2025
Breach of contract · Unfair dismissal
A decision is one line of the story
The register tells you that a claim was decided. It does not tell you whether the company is solvent, whether its accounts are overdue, whether it has been through insolvency, or what its directors have done elsewhere. A free CheckAFirm check adds all of that from Companies House in about a minute.
Run a free company checkQuestions people ask
Are employment tribunal decisions public?
Yes. Since 2017 every employment tribunal judgment in England, Wales and Scotland is published in a public online register run by the Ministry of Justice, and anyone can read it without an account or a fee. Names of the claimant and the employer appear in the title of the decision. Older cases, and cases settled before a hearing, will not be there.
Does a tribunal decision mean the employer lost?
No. The register contains every published judgment, including claims the employer won, claims dismissed on a technical point such as being brought out of time, preliminary rulings on procedure, and consent judgments where the parties agreed an outcome. The title alone tells you nothing about who succeeded, which is why every result here links straight to the official decision rather than being summarised.
Can I search tribunal decisions by company name?
Yes. Type the employer's name in the box above. Decision titles are free text typed by tribunal staff, so a firm can appear under a trading name, an old name, or with the Ltd left off. Search the shortest distinctive part of the name, then check the results against the company record.
Should a tribunal claim put me off using a company?
On its own, rarely. A single claim at a company with 200 staff is unremarkable, and employers win a substantial share of the claims brought against them. A pattern is different information: several claims in a short period, or claims that repeat the same subject, is worth knowing before you take a job or sign a contract. Read the decisions rather than counting them.
How far back does the register go?
The online register starts in 2017 for England and Wales and covers Scotland from the same period. Decisions before that were kept in a physical register and are not published online, so absence of a decision is not evidence that a firm has never been to a tribunal.
How do I check the company behind an employer?
Every result here has a link that runs a free CheckAFirm company check on the respondent's name. That shows the company status, age, overdue filings, insolvency history and the directors' other companies, which is the context a decision title does not give you.
Decisions are published by the Ministry of Justice and read live from the GOV.UK register. CheckAFirm does not host, edit or summarise them, and does not decide what appears there. If you believe a decision is wrong or should not be published, that is a matter for the tribunal that issued it.