Official public register
Employment tribunal decisions
Search 133,515 published decision by employer, claimant or case number. Each result links to the official judgment on GOV.UK, and to a free company check on the employer.
Most recently published
- J Ogunbona v Care South: 6026334/2025
28 July 2026 · Case 6026334/2025
Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr A Jones v DA Environmental Services Ltd (in voluntary liquidation): 1401718/2025
27 July 2026 · Case 1401718/2025
Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Unfair dismissal · Working time regulations
- Mr R Parsons v Horizon Leisure Trust: 6043377/2025
20 July 2026 · Case 6043377/2025
Unfair dismissal
- L Rembowski v Altrad Employment Services Ltd: 6026939/2025
17 July 2026 · Case 6026939/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr L Polewczyk v Chichester Stone Creations Ltd: 1402474/2025
24 July 2026 · Case 1402474/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages
- K De Villiers v Wave Multi Academy Trust: 6040651/2025
23 July 2026 · Case 6040651/2025
Unfair dismissal
- Ms J Morgan v Panelex Wood Agency Ltd and F G Hawkes: 1600173/2025
2 June 2026 · Case 1600173/2025
Breach of contract · Maternity and pregnancy rights · Sex discrimination · Unfair dismissal · Victimisation discrimination · Working time regulations
- Mr S Morriss v Leidos Industrial Engineers Ltd: 3205717/2022
5 August 2026 · Case 3205717/2022
Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal
- S S Francis v DR Medical Clinic Ltd: 3200988/2025
6 July 2026 · Case 3200988/2025
Unfair dismissal
- T Kanane v Young & Co’s Brewery plc: 6005766/2024
3 July 2026 · Case 6005766/2024
Breach of contract · Race discrimination · Religion or belief discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Mr M Chowdhury v Property Partners Management Ltd: 6031650/2025
29 July 2026 · Case 6031650/2025
Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Race discrimination · Religion or belief discrimination · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- T Eaton v Moreton Church of England Primary School: 6023286/2025
6 July 2026 · Case 6023286/2025
Unfair dismissal
- Miss N Abimbola v Citi Group Global Markets Ltd: 6028312/2025 and 6002219/2026
27 July 2026 · Case 6028312/2025 and 6002219/2026
Interim relief
- Mr R Trindade v Silverman Opticians Ltd: 3200344/2023
21 July 2026 · Case 3200344/2023
Religion or belief discrimination
- Mrs M Ratnayake v Eyesto Education Ltd– In Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation: 6030024/2025
8 June 2026 · Case 6030024/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages · Written pay statement
- M Farooq v Fast Despatch Logistics Ltd: 6036880/2025
14 July 2026 · Case 6036880/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages
- Miss C Griffiths v Peninsula Business Services Ltd: 6006296/2024
20 April 2026 · Case 6006296/2024
Maternity and pregnancy rights · Sex discrimination
- Miss J Zhang v Asda Express Ltd: 6000589/2025
17 October 2025 · Case 6000589/2025
Disability discrimination · Redundancy · Unfair dismissal
- Mr M Mahoney-Stack v The Chief Constable of Lancashire Constabulary: 2409654/2023
5 October 2025 · Case 2409654/2023
Disability discrimination
- Miss J Yousif v Defaqto Leisure Ltd T/a Terrace NQ: 2402407/2024
15 December 2025 · Case 2402407/2024
Disability discrimination · Race discrimination
A decision is one line of the story
The register tells you that a claim was decided. It does not tell you whether the company is solvent, whether its accounts are overdue, whether it has been through insolvency, or what its directors have done elsewhere. A free CheckAFirm check adds all of that from Companies House in about a minute.
Run a free company checkQuestions people ask
Are employment tribunal decisions public?
Yes. Since 2017 every employment tribunal judgment in England, Wales and Scotland is published in a public online register run by the Ministry of Justice, and anyone can read it without an account or a fee. Names of the claimant and the employer appear in the title of the decision. Older cases, and cases settled before a hearing, will not be there.
Does a tribunal decision mean the employer lost?
No. The register contains every published judgment, including claims the employer won, claims dismissed on a technical point such as being brought out of time, preliminary rulings on procedure, and consent judgments where the parties agreed an outcome. The title alone tells you nothing about who succeeded, which is why every result here links straight to the official decision rather than being summarised.
Can I search tribunal decisions by company name?
Yes. Type the employer's name in the box above. Decision titles are free text typed by tribunal staff, so a firm can appear under a trading name, an old name, or with the Ltd left off. Search the shortest distinctive part of the name, then check the results against the company record.
Should a tribunal claim put me off using a company?
On its own, rarely. A single claim at a company with 200 staff is unremarkable, and employers win a substantial share of the claims brought against them. A pattern is different information: several claims in a short period, or claims that repeat the same subject, is worth knowing before you take a job or sign a contract. Read the decisions rather than counting them.
How far back does the register go?
The online register starts in 2017 for England and Wales and covers Scotland from the same period. Decisions before that were kept in a physical register and are not published online, so absence of a decision is not evidence that a firm has never been to a tribunal.
How do I check the company behind an employer?
Every result here has a link that runs a free CheckAFirm company check on the respondent's name. That shows the company status, age, overdue filings, insolvency history and the directors' other companies, which is the context a decision title does not give you.
Decisions are published by the Ministry of Justice and read live from the GOV.UK register. CheckAFirm does not host, edit or summarise them, and does not decide what appears there. If you believe a decision is wrong or should not be published, that is a matter for the tribunal that issued it.