Official public register
Employment tribunal decisions
Search 134,582 published decision by employer, claimant or case number. Each result links to the official judgment on GOV.UK, and to a free company check on the employer.
Most recently published
- Ms K Edwards v Wrexham County Borough Council: 1601501/2026
2 September 2026 · Case 1601501/2026
Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal
- Mr R Puttock v Royal Marines Association - The Royal Marines Charity: 6010866/2024
21 August 2026 · Case 6010866/2024
Unfair dismissal
- Mr J McConnell v Bento Box T/a Little Tokyo Ltd (In creditors’ voluntary liquidation) and others: 1802885/2024 and 1802886/2024
10 April 2026 · Case 1802885/2024 and 1802886/2024
Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Redundancy · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr H Walayat v Department of Health and Social Care: 1801774/2024
26 June 2026 · Case 1801774/2024
Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Mr G Silva v Next Distribution Ltd: 1800121/2024 and others
6 July 2026 · Case 1800121/2024 and others
Disability discrimination
- Miss E Farrar v Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust: 6018181/2025
3 July 2026 · Case 6018181/2025
Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal
- Mrs C Ogah v Anchor Hanover Group and Ms V Gudgin: 1804206/2025
26 June 2026 · Case 1804206/2025
Race discrimination
- Mr B Langron v Royal Mail Group Ltd: 1807893/2023 and others
15 May 2024 · Case 1807893/2023 and others
Age discrimination · Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Race discrimination · Redundancy · Religion or belief discrimination · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr R Wilks and others v Bell Global Property Services (UK) Ltd and others: 1804158/2023 and others
1 May 2026 · Case 1804158/2023 and others
Disability discrimination
- N Adams v Public Health Wales: 1604162/2025
14 July 2026 · Case 1604162/2025
Unfair dismissal
- N Rolph v Iceland Foods Ltd: 1600009/2025 and 1600237/2025
4 June 2026 · Case 1600009/2025 and 1600237/2025
Unfair dismissal · Victimisation discrimination
- Ms M Joseph v The Secretary of State for Justice: 1601053/2024
14 April 2026 · Case 1601053/2024
Age discrimination · Disability discrimination
- Mr M Turner v ITEC Training Solutions Ltd: 1603349/2025
28 April 2026 · Case 1603349/2025
Unfair dismissal
- Mr R Leeding v Proserve Logistics Ltd: 1603212/2025
23 June 2026 · Case 1603212/2025
Age discrimination · Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal
- Mrs A Moye v Shaw Trust Ltd: 1401354/2025
28 August 2026 · Case 1401354/2025
Disability discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Miss G Mead v Saunas By The Sea Ltd: 6013490/2026
17 August 2026 · Case 6013490/2026
Working time regulations
- Mr S Pearce v Stores Supply Ltd: 6039934/2025
21 August 2026 · Case 6039934/2025
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- N Hussain v Rexel UK Ltd: 6025455/2026
22 August 2026 · Case 6025455/2026
Interim relief
- X v Ministry of Defence: 1402789/2024
27 August 2026 · Case 1402789/2024
Sex discrimination
- Mr G A W Wanya v Barts Health NHS Trust: 3200688/2024
19 June 2025 · Case 3200688/2024
Breach of contract · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
A decision is one line of the story
The register tells you that a claim was decided. It does not tell you whether the company is solvent, whether its accounts are overdue, whether it has been through insolvency, or what its directors have done elsewhere. A free CheckAFirm check adds all of that from Companies House in about a minute.
Run a free company checkQuestions people ask
Are employment tribunal decisions public?
Yes. Since 2017 every employment tribunal judgment in England, Wales and Scotland is published in a public online register run by the Ministry of Justice, and anyone can read it without an account or a fee. Names of the claimant and the employer appear in the title of the decision. Older cases, and cases settled before a hearing, will not be there.
Does a tribunal decision mean the employer lost?
No. The register contains every published judgment, including claims the employer won, claims dismissed on a technical point such as being brought out of time, preliminary rulings on procedure, and consent judgments where the parties agreed an outcome. The title alone tells you nothing about who succeeded, which is why every result here links straight to the official decision rather than being summarised.
Can I search tribunal decisions by company name?
Yes. Type the employer's name in the box above. Decision titles are free text typed by tribunal staff, so a firm can appear under a trading name, an old name, or with the Ltd left off. Search the shortest distinctive part of the name, then check the results against the company record.
Should a tribunal claim put me off using a company?
On its own, rarely. A single claim at a company with 200 staff is unremarkable, and employers win a substantial share of the claims brought against them. A pattern is different information: several claims in a short period, or claims that repeat the same subject, is worth knowing before you take a job or sign a contract. Read the decisions rather than counting them.
How far back does the register go?
The online register starts in 2017 for England and Wales and covers Scotland from the same period. Decisions before that were kept in a physical register and are not published online, so absence of a decision is not evidence that a firm has never been to a tribunal.
How do I check the company behind an employer?
Every result here has a link that runs a free CheckAFirm company check on the respondent's name. That shows the company status, age, overdue filings, insolvency history and the directors' other companies, which is the context a decision title does not give you.
Decisions are published by the Ministry of Justice and read live from the GOV.UK register. CheckAFirm does not host, edit or summarise them, and does not decide what appears there. If you believe a decision is wrong or should not be published, that is a matter for the tribunal that issued it.