Official public register
Employment tribunal decisions
Search 134,556 published decision by employer, claimant or case number. Each result links to the official judgment on GOV.UK, and to a free company check on the employer.
Most recently published
- S Lawrence v Tokko Ltd: 6028549/2026
11 September 2026 · Case 6028549/2026
Interim relief
- Mr A Hartley v eBay (UK) Ltd: 6018467/2024
20 July 2026 · Case 6018467/2024
Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Race discrimination · Sex discrimination
- I Ciobotea v Steer Automotive Group Ltd: 6019455/2024
9 September 2026 · Case 6019455/2024
Race discrimination · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr Z Grudziecki and Mr P Lichon v New Pro Foundries Ltd: 3314583/2023 and 3314584/2023
18 August 2026 · Case 3314583/2023 and 3314584/2023
Breach of contract · Redundancy · Working time regulations
- R Fedoriv v Claylens Mills Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation): 6027782/2025
1 September 2026 · Case 6027782/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr J Wharton v Sheehan Haulage & Plant Hire Ltd: 3301011/2021
17 August 2026 · Case 3301011/2021
Breach of contract · Working time regulations
- Mr R Seredynski v P N Daly Ltd: 6008825/2024
29 June 2026 · Case 6008825/2024
Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr R Gomez v Our Lady’s Abingdon Trustees Ltd (in voluntary liquidation): 6003132/2025
20 May 2026 · Case 6003132/2025
Unfair dismissal
- Miss M Baulch v Milton Keynes Veterinary Group: 3300530/2025
9 September 2026 · Case 3300530/2025
Unfair dismissal
- Mr C Riches v Total Home Delivery Ltd: 3303850/2025 and 3303852/2025
5 June 2026 · Case 3303850/2025 and 3303852/2025
Contract of employment · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- D R Evmorfopoulou v PR Architects Ltd: 6026757/2025
27 July 2026 · Case 6026757/2025
Breach of contract · Redundancy · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- G Pare v Vista Panels: 6027456/2025
21 July 2026 · Case 6027456/2025
Unfair dismissal
- Dr N Tavva v Brinton Healthcare UK Ltd and Others: 6036158/2025 and 6036469/2025
18 July 2026 · Case 6036158/2025 and 6036469/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mrs Z Moosa v Lancaster Student Lettings Ltd: 6015643/2026
8 September 2026 · Case 6015643/2026
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mrs A Iliadi v Palmers Patisserie Manufacturing Ltd: 6015482/2025
8 September 2026 · Case 6015482/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages
- P Somma v Northern Pour - Lever St Ltd (formerly WDS Lever St Ltd): 6004136/2026
28 July 2026 · Case 6004136/2026
Working time regulations
- Mr R Do Nascimento v Greene King Bury St Edmunds: 6011122/2025
21 September 2026 · Case 6011122/2025
Age discrimination · Whistleblowing · Race discrimination · Religion or belief discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Mr F Nwaka v Media Stream AI Ltd: 6006748/2026
21 September 2026 · Case 6006748/2026
Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr L Rees v JP&H Specialists Ltd: 2300518/2026
3 September 2026 · Case 2300518/2026
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr I Seitayev v Jusan Technologies Ltd and Mr M R Wahid: 6003675/2024
19 May 2026 · Case 6003675/2024
Whistleblowing
A decision is one line of the story
The register tells you that a claim was decided. It does not tell you whether the company is solvent, whether its accounts are overdue, whether it has been through insolvency, or what its directors have done elsewhere. A free CheckAFirm check adds all of that from Companies House in about a minute.
Run a free company checkQuestions people ask
Are employment tribunal decisions public?
Yes. Since 2017 every employment tribunal judgment in England, Wales and Scotland is published in a public online register run by the Ministry of Justice, and anyone can read it without an account or a fee. Names of the claimant and the employer appear in the title of the decision. Older cases, and cases settled before a hearing, will not be there.
Does a tribunal decision mean the employer lost?
No. The register contains every published judgment, including claims the employer won, claims dismissed on a technical point such as being brought out of time, preliminary rulings on procedure, and consent judgments where the parties agreed an outcome. The title alone tells you nothing about who succeeded, which is why every result here links straight to the official decision rather than being summarised.
Can I search tribunal decisions by company name?
Yes. Type the employer's name in the box above. Decision titles are free text typed by tribunal staff, so a firm can appear under a trading name, an old name, or with the Ltd left off. Search the shortest distinctive part of the name, then check the results against the company record.
Should a tribunal claim put me off using a company?
On its own, rarely. A single claim at a company with 200 staff is unremarkable, and employers win a substantial share of the claims brought against them. A pattern is different information: several claims in a short period, or claims that repeat the same subject, is worth knowing before you take a job or sign a contract. Read the decisions rather than counting them.
How far back does the register go?
The online register starts in 2017 for England and Wales and covers Scotland from the same period. Decisions before that were kept in a physical register and are not published online, so absence of a decision is not evidence that a firm has never been to a tribunal.
How do I check the company behind an employer?
Every result here has a link that runs a free CheckAFirm company check on the respondent's name. That shows the company status, age, overdue filings, insolvency history and the directors' other companies, which is the context a decision title does not give you.
Decisions are published by the Ministry of Justice and read live from the GOV.UK register. CheckAFirm does not host, edit or summarise them, and does not decide what appears there. If you believe a decision is wrong or should not be published, that is a matter for the tribunal that issued it.