Official public register
Employment tribunal decisions
Search 134,582 published decision by employer, claimant or case number. Each result links to the official judgment on GOV.UK, and to a free company check on the employer.
Most recently published
- Mr E A Musliev v P J Long, W S Long and the Personal Representations of P W Long (Deceased) T/a Lutton Farm Partnership and Others: 3306056/2024
17 June 2025 · Case 3306056/2024
Protective award · Redundancy · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Dr Y Umar v Entoplast Ltd: 6012365/2024
4 November 2025 · Case 6012365/2024
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Miss D Adams-Garvin v Lifeways Community Care Ltd: 1804450/2025
2 February 2026 · Case 1804450/2025
Unfair dismissal
- S Watts v Dubit Ltd: 6017063/2025
20 January 2026 · Case 6017063/2025
Unfair dismissal
- Mrs D Hopkinson v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Ms J Fenelon: 6014163/2024
9 January 2026 · Case 6014163/2024
Age discrimination
- D Calvert v Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust: 6018383/2025
29 May 2026 · Case 6018383/2025
Breach of contract · Unfair dismissal
- JK v University of Bradford: 6000283/2024
2 September 2025 · Case 6000283/2024
Whistleblowing · Race discrimination
- B Shiells v Governors of Ripon Grammar School and North Yorkshire Council: 6017358/2025
4 August 2025 · Case 6017358/2025
Whistleblowing
- Ms S Streadwick v Capita Business Services Ltd: 2215439/2023
18 June 2025 · Case 2215439/2023
Disability discrimination
- Ms L Channell v Binfield Preschool: 3304355/2025
3 August 2026 · Case 3304355/2025
Redundancy
- Mr A Akindele v Electronic Business Information Technology Solutions LLP: 3303447/2024
5 August 2026 · Case 3303447/2024
Unfair dismissal
- Mr A P S Rihal v John Lewis plc: 3301601/2025
4 August 2026 · Case 3301601/2025
Age discrimination · Disability discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- N Stamatiou v Style Cheat Ltd: 6036441/2025
9 July 2026 · Case 6036441/2025
Redundancy · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr R Sisley v Of Planet Earth Ltd: 3306603/2024 and 3311828/2024
4 September 2026 · Case 3306603/2024 and 3311828/2024
Breach of contract · Contract of employment · Redundancy · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- S Darkwa v Ikan Facilities Management: 6011562/2026
9 September 2026 · Case 6011562/2026
Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Miss S Grant v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd: 2302981/2024
31 July 2026 · Case 2302981/2024
Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Race discrimination · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr M Nakhuda v London Ambulance Service NHS Trust: 6004706/2026
11 September 2026 · Case 6004706/2026
Redundancy · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr Beig v Home Office and Others: 6007641/2025 and 6013850/2025
10 September 2026 · Case 6007641/2025 and 6013850/2025
Age discrimination · Breach of contract · Race discrimination · Religion or belief discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- A Molas v Pharma Targeting Ltd: 6004492/2026
11 September 2026 · Case 6004492/2026
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr Sahag v Mitie Ltd: 6008991/2025
7 July 2026 · Case 6008991/2025
Unfair dismissal
A decision is one line of the story
The register tells you that a claim was decided. It does not tell you whether the company is solvent, whether its accounts are overdue, whether it has been through insolvency, or what its directors have done elsewhere. A free CheckAFirm check adds all of that from Companies House in about a minute.
Run a free company checkQuestions people ask
Are employment tribunal decisions public?
Yes. Since 2017 every employment tribunal judgment in England, Wales and Scotland is published in a public online register run by the Ministry of Justice, and anyone can read it without an account or a fee. Names of the claimant and the employer appear in the title of the decision. Older cases, and cases settled before a hearing, will not be there.
Does a tribunal decision mean the employer lost?
No. The register contains every published judgment, including claims the employer won, claims dismissed on a technical point such as being brought out of time, preliminary rulings on procedure, and consent judgments where the parties agreed an outcome. The title alone tells you nothing about who succeeded, which is why every result here links straight to the official decision rather than being summarised.
Can I search tribunal decisions by company name?
Yes. Type the employer's name in the box above. Decision titles are free text typed by tribunal staff, so a firm can appear under a trading name, an old name, or with the Ltd left off. Search the shortest distinctive part of the name, then check the results against the company record.
Should a tribunal claim put me off using a company?
On its own, rarely. A single claim at a company with 200 staff is unremarkable, and employers win a substantial share of the claims brought against them. A pattern is different information: several claims in a short period, or claims that repeat the same subject, is worth knowing before you take a job or sign a contract. Read the decisions rather than counting them.
How far back does the register go?
The online register starts in 2017 for England and Wales and covers Scotland from the same period. Decisions before that were kept in a physical register and are not published online, so absence of a decision is not evidence that a firm has never been to a tribunal.
How do I check the company behind an employer?
Every result here has a link that runs a free CheckAFirm company check on the respondent's name. That shows the company status, age, overdue filings, insolvency history and the directors' other companies, which is the context a decision title does not give you.
Decisions are published by the Ministry of Justice and read live from the GOV.UK register. CheckAFirm does not host, edit or summarise them, and does not decide what appears there. If you believe a decision is wrong or should not be published, that is a matter for the tribunal that issued it.