Official public register
Employment tribunal decisions
Search 133,515 published decision by employer, claimant or case number. Each result links to the official judgment on GOV.UK, and to a free company check on the employer.
Most recently published
- L Cheetham v St Mary Island Primary School and Medway Council: 2305314/2020
20 July 2026 · Case 2305314/2020
Part time workers · Sex discrimination · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- J Attwood v Veritas Multi Academy Trust: 2303731/2020
21 July 2026 · Case 2303731/2020
Part time workers · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- S-A Cooper v Veritas Multi Academy Trust: 2303732/2020
21 July 2026 · Case 2303732/2020
Part time workers · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- L England v Balfour Junior Academy and Fort Pitt Thomas Averling Academies: 2305576/2020
21 July 2026 · Case 2305576/2020
Part time workers · Sex discrimination · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Ms A Stanworth v Royal Mail Group Ltd: 1801798/2025 and 1805452/2025
22 July 2026 · Case 1801798/2025 and 1805452/2025
Disability discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Mr P Colta v S&S Consulting Services: 6045376/2025
17 July 2026 · Case 6045376/2025
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr J Baker v British Steel Ltd: 6031370/2025
24 July 2026 · Case 6031370/2025
Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal · Working time regulations
- Mr D Eddy v The Chief Constable of Wiltshire Police: 6032900/2025
9 July 2026 · Case 6032900/2025
Unfair dismissal
- M Bogle v The Village Bakery (Wrexham) Ltd: 6020497/2025
27 July 2026 · Case 6020497/2025
Disability discrimination · Sex discrimination · Unlawful deduction from wages
- S Graves v C De Souza: 1400369/2025
16 July 2026 · Case 1400369/2025
Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr D G Charles v DIJLA Ltd T/a Dominos Pizza: 2406708/2024
9 July 2026 · Case 2406708/2024
Age discrimination
- Mr A Abushama v Extons Foods Ltd and Proman Supply Chain Ltd: 2400006/2023
10 July 2026 · Case 2400006/2023
Disability discrimination · Race discrimination
- AB v LVP Apartments Ltd: 6002435/2025
16 July 2026 · Case 6002435/2025
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages
- P Belcota v T2Z Care Services: 6017757/2025
14 July 2026 · Case 6017757/2025
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr K Bannister v Thamesway Transport Services Ltd: 2303083/2023
24 October 2025 · Case 2303083/2023
Breach of contract · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- C Knight v R Gunson: 6033182/2025
20 July 2026 · Case 6033182/2025
Unfair dismissal
- N Solovjevskaja v Iron Mountain (UK) Services Ltd: 6023159/2024
27 July 2026 · Case 6023159/2024
Disability discrimination
- Mr M Thomas v Rise Contracting Services Ltd and Involve Recruitment Ltd: 6006529/2026
17 July 2026 · Case 6006529/2026
Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mrs V Plesca v Fort Engineering Ltd: 3313227/2023
27 July 2026 · Case 3313227/2023
Breach of contract · Maternity and pregnancy rights · Redundancy · Unfair dismissal · Working time regulations
- Mr D Fedjanins and Mrs I Fedjanina v Universal Contractors Ltd: 3302121/2025 and 3302122/2025
3 December 2025 · Case 3302121/2025 and 3302122/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages
A decision is one line of the story
The register tells you that a claim was decided. It does not tell you whether the company is solvent, whether its accounts are overdue, whether it has been through insolvency, or what its directors have done elsewhere. A free CheckAFirm check adds all of that from Companies House in about a minute.
Run a free company checkQuestions people ask
Are employment tribunal decisions public?
Yes. Since 2017 every employment tribunal judgment in England, Wales and Scotland is published in a public online register run by the Ministry of Justice, and anyone can read it without an account or a fee. Names of the claimant and the employer appear in the title of the decision. Older cases, and cases settled before a hearing, will not be there.
Does a tribunal decision mean the employer lost?
No. The register contains every published judgment, including claims the employer won, claims dismissed on a technical point such as being brought out of time, preliminary rulings on procedure, and consent judgments where the parties agreed an outcome. The title alone tells you nothing about who succeeded, which is why every result here links straight to the official decision rather than being summarised.
Can I search tribunal decisions by company name?
Yes. Type the employer's name in the box above. Decision titles are free text typed by tribunal staff, so a firm can appear under a trading name, an old name, or with the Ltd left off. Search the shortest distinctive part of the name, then check the results against the company record.
Should a tribunal claim put me off using a company?
On its own, rarely. A single claim at a company with 200 staff is unremarkable, and employers win a substantial share of the claims brought against them. A pattern is different information: several claims in a short period, or claims that repeat the same subject, is worth knowing before you take a job or sign a contract. Read the decisions rather than counting them.
How far back does the register go?
The online register starts in 2017 for England and Wales and covers Scotland from the same period. Decisions before that were kept in a physical register and are not published online, so absence of a decision is not evidence that a firm has never been to a tribunal.
How do I check the company behind an employer?
Every result here has a link that runs a free CheckAFirm company check on the respondent's name. That shows the company status, age, overdue filings, insolvency history and the directors' other companies, which is the context a decision title does not give you.
Decisions are published by the Ministry of Justice and read live from the GOV.UK register. CheckAFirm does not host, edit or summarise them, and does not decide what appears there. If you believe a decision is wrong or should not be published, that is a matter for the tribunal that issued it.