Official public register
Employment tribunal decisions
Search 134,582 published decision by employer, claimant or case number. Each result links to the official judgment on GOV.UK, and to a free company check on the employer.
Most recently published
- Mr P Olasimoju v Uber London Ltd: 2301304/2021
12 August 2026 · Case 2301304/2021
National minimum wage · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Ms K O’Riordan v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis: 6012971/2024
13 August 2026 · Case 6012971/2024
Disability discrimination
- Mrs W Croft v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust: 2300785/2022
2 September 2024 · Case 2300785/2022
Race discrimination · Sex discrimination
- Mr A McInnes v Bibby Energy Solutions: 8000094/2026
28 August 2026 · Case 8000094/2026
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr C Rebelo v Serco Ltd: 2301704/2023
7 November 2024 · Case 2301704/2023
Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Race discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Mr J Shepherd v Zonal Retail Data System Ltd and Comtrex Systems Corporation Ltd: 2312435/2024
4 February 2026 · Case 2312435/2024
Age discrimination · Unfair dismissal · Working time regulations
- Mr S Brown v The Chief Constable of Sussex Police: 2305555/2024
3 February 2026 · Case 2305555/2024
Sex discrimination
- Mr A P Suter v Royal Mail Group Ltd: 2305055/2024
7 November 2024 · Case 2305055/2024
Unlawful deduction from wages
- Ms N Rathnayake v DSRE Services Ltd: 2305575/2024
22 April 2026 · Case 2305575/2024
Breach of contract · Race discrimination
- Mr K Whyte v Highland Health Board: 8002310/2025
28 August 2026 · Case 8002310/2025
Disability discrimination
- K Harlock v D McLean @ MIH: 6035939/2025 and 6041883/2025
19 June 2026 · Case 6035939/2025 and 6041883/2025
Disability discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Mr W O'Driscoll v NRS Healthcare (In Liquidation): 8002660/2025
28 July 2026 · Case 8002660/2025
Breach of contract
- M Kaur v GRS Foods FK Ltd: 8000621/2026
24 July 2026 · Case 8000621/2026
Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr K Hay and others v National Timber Group Scotland Ltd (In Administration): 4100486/2026 and others
23 July 2026 · Case 4100486/2026 and others
Protective award · Redundancy
- S Caldwell and others v Kellwood Engineering Ltd (In Liquidation): 4100321/2025 and others
15 July 2026 · Case 4100321/2025 and others
Protective award · Redundancy
- E Ayuni v Edinburgh Consulting Group Ltd: 8000522/2026
6 July 2026 · Case 8000522/2026
Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr C Moffat v Coille Haulage Ltd (In Liquidation): 8002232/2025
2 July 2026 · Case 8002232/2025
Protective award · Redundancy
- Mrs W Addo v Haberdashers’ Aske’s Federation Trust: 2303059/2023
24 August 2026 · Case 2303059/2023
Race discrimination
- Mr T C Coman v P J Long, W S Long and the Personal Representations of P W Long (Deceased) T/a Lutton Farm Partnership and Others: 3306053/2024
17 June 2025 · Case 3306053/2024
Protective award · Redundancy · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mrs K H Chausheva v P J Long, W S Long and the Personal Representations of P W Long (Deceased) T/a Lutton Farm Partnership and Others: 3306055/2024
17 June 2025 · Case 3306055/2024
Protective award · Redundancy · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
A decision is one line of the story
The register tells you that a claim was decided. It does not tell you whether the company is solvent, whether its accounts are overdue, whether it has been through insolvency, or what its directors have done elsewhere. A free CheckAFirm check adds all of that from Companies House in about a minute.
Run a free company checkQuestions people ask
Are employment tribunal decisions public?
Yes. Since 2017 every employment tribunal judgment in England, Wales and Scotland is published in a public online register run by the Ministry of Justice, and anyone can read it without an account or a fee. Names of the claimant and the employer appear in the title of the decision. Older cases, and cases settled before a hearing, will not be there.
Does a tribunal decision mean the employer lost?
No. The register contains every published judgment, including claims the employer won, claims dismissed on a technical point such as being brought out of time, preliminary rulings on procedure, and consent judgments where the parties agreed an outcome. The title alone tells you nothing about who succeeded, which is why every result here links straight to the official decision rather than being summarised.
Can I search tribunal decisions by company name?
Yes. Type the employer's name in the box above. Decision titles are free text typed by tribunal staff, so a firm can appear under a trading name, an old name, or with the Ltd left off. Search the shortest distinctive part of the name, then check the results against the company record.
Should a tribunal claim put me off using a company?
On its own, rarely. A single claim at a company with 200 staff is unremarkable, and employers win a substantial share of the claims brought against them. A pattern is different information: several claims in a short period, or claims that repeat the same subject, is worth knowing before you take a job or sign a contract. Read the decisions rather than counting them.
How far back does the register go?
The online register starts in 2017 for England and Wales and covers Scotland from the same period. Decisions before that were kept in a physical register and are not published online, so absence of a decision is not evidence that a firm has never been to a tribunal.
How do I check the company behind an employer?
Every result here has a link that runs a free CheckAFirm company check on the respondent's name. That shows the company status, age, overdue filings, insolvency history and the directors' other companies, which is the context a decision title does not give you.
Decisions are published by the Ministry of Justice and read live from the GOV.UK register. CheckAFirm does not host, edit or summarise them, and does not decide what appears there. If you believe a decision is wrong or should not be published, that is a matter for the tribunal that issued it.