Official public register
Employment tribunal decisions
Search 133,514 published decision by employer, claimant or case number. Each result links to the official judgment on GOV.UK, and to a free company check on the employer.
Most recently published
- Ms K Burton v Diocese of St Albans Multi Academy Trust: 6003597/2025
20 July 2026 · Case 6003597/2025
Disability discrimination · Race discrimination
- Mr M Awan v Mr R Tilling and Royal Mail Group Ltd: 3304745/2024
13 August 2026 · Case 3304745/2024
Disability discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Ms D Fox v Ramsay Health Care (UK) Operations Ltd: 6006571/2024
20 May 2026 · Case 6006571/2024
Age discrimination · Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr S March v Adarga Ltd: 6019563/2025
10 August 2026 · Case 6019563/2025
Breach of contract · Redundancy · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr S Saeed v Relifetech Recycling Ltd: 6025343/2025
23 April 2026 · Case 6025343/2025
Breach of contract · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mrs A Brzakalska and H Oleszkiewicz v Greene King Ltd: 4103805/2025 and Others
28 July 2026 · Case 4103805/2025 and Others
Disability discrimination
- I Baerens v DTV Optimise Ltd: 8000586/2026
28 July 2026 · Case 8000586/2026
Disability discrimination
- Miss G Lockyer v MacDonald Highland Resort Ltd: 8000226/2026
27 July 2026 · Case 8000226/2026
Disability discrimination
- Mr M Munro v Stonegate Pub Company Ltd: 8000764/2026
24 July 2026 · Case 8000764/2026
Unfair dismissal
- Ms E Owusu v SCCL Operations Ltd: 4100464/2026
24 July 2026 · Case 4100464/2026
Breach of contract · Race discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- M Sheridan v Advice Direct Scotland Ltd: 8001743/2025
24 July 2026 · Case 8001743/2025
Race discrimination · Unfair dismissal · Victimisation discrimination
- Mr S O’Donnell v Lidl Great Britain Ltd: 8003110/2025
24 July 2026 · Case 8003110/2025
Sex discrimination
- Mrs P Ibhagbosoria v Greymate Care Ltd: 8002788/2025
21 July 2026 · Case 8002788/2025
Breach of contract · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- C-W Kang v HZR Enterprise Ltd: 8000645/2026
21 July 2026 · Case 8000645/2026
Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr Z Khan v West Midlands Travel Ltd T/a National Express Accessible Transport: 1305002/2024 and 1305003/2024
13 August 2026 · Case 1305002/2024 and 1305003/2024
Unfair dismissal
- Mr D Hannigan v Metropolitan School of Business and Management UK Ltd: 6003975/2024
14 March 2025 · Case 6003975/2024
Breach of contract · Unlawful deduction from wages
- U Ali v A Asghar T/a Glasgow Trash Removals: 8003081/2025
20 July 2026 · Case 8003081/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages
- Ms C Uzoho v Lerue Healthcare Ltd: 8000342/2026
20 July 2026 · Case 8000342/2026
Redundancy · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations
- Mr K Charles v London Borough of Hackney: 3206012/2022
15 September 2025 · Case 3206012/2022
Breach of contract · Race discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Mr M Sameer v Tesco Stores Ltd: 6012447/2024
17 October 2025 · Case 6012447/2024
Age discrimination · Race discrimination · Religion or belief discrimination · Unfair dismissal
A decision is one line of the story
The register tells you that a claim was decided. It does not tell you whether the company is solvent, whether its accounts are overdue, whether it has been through insolvency, or what its directors have done elsewhere. A free CheckAFirm check adds all of that from Companies House in about a minute.
Run a free company checkQuestions people ask
Are employment tribunal decisions public?
Yes. Since 2017 every employment tribunal judgment in England, Wales and Scotland is published in a public online register run by the Ministry of Justice, and anyone can read it without an account or a fee. Names of the claimant and the employer appear in the title of the decision. Older cases, and cases settled before a hearing, will not be there.
Does a tribunal decision mean the employer lost?
No. The register contains every published judgment, including claims the employer won, claims dismissed on a technical point such as being brought out of time, preliminary rulings on procedure, and consent judgments where the parties agreed an outcome. The title alone tells you nothing about who succeeded, which is why every result here links straight to the official decision rather than being summarised.
Can I search tribunal decisions by company name?
Yes. Type the employer's name in the box above. Decision titles are free text typed by tribunal staff, so a firm can appear under a trading name, an old name, or with the Ltd left off. Search the shortest distinctive part of the name, then check the results against the company record.
Should a tribunal claim put me off using a company?
On its own, rarely. A single claim at a company with 200 staff is unremarkable, and employers win a substantial share of the claims brought against them. A pattern is different information: several claims in a short period, or claims that repeat the same subject, is worth knowing before you take a job or sign a contract. Read the decisions rather than counting them.
How far back does the register go?
The online register starts in 2017 for England and Wales and covers Scotland from the same period. Decisions before that were kept in a physical register and are not published online, so absence of a decision is not evidence that a firm has never been to a tribunal.
How do I check the company behind an employer?
Every result here has a link that runs a free CheckAFirm company check on the respondent's name. That shows the company status, age, overdue filings, insolvency history and the directors' other companies, which is the context a decision title does not give you.
Decisions are published by the Ministry of Justice and read live from the GOV.UK register. CheckAFirm does not host, edit or summarise them, and does not decide what appears there. If you believe a decision is wrong or should not be published, that is a matter for the tribunal that issued it.