Official public register
Employment tribunal decisions
Search 134,582 published decision by employer, claimant or case number. Each result links to the official judgment on GOV.UK, and to a free company check on the employer.
Most recently published
- Mr Varghese v South West London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust: 2300861/2026
14 September 2026 · Case 2300861/2026
Breach of contract · Unfair dismissal · Working time regulations
- Mr T Mason v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd: 6012922/2025
15 September 2026 · Case 6012922/2025
Breach of contract · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- R Butterworth v John Lewis plc: 6010495/2025
11 September 2026 · Case 6010495/2025
Unfair dismissal
- Mr G Impoco and Mr G Impoco v That's Amore Ltd: 3300857/2025 and 3300858/2025
11 August 2026 · Case 3300857/2025 and 3300858/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages
- Miss E Philips v The London Borough of Croydon: 6005496/2024
17 September 2026 · Case 6005496/2024
Disability discrimination
- Mr A St Auburn v Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and Unison Trade Union: 6009627/2024
7 August 2026 · Case 6009627/2024
Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Race discrimination · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Professor Lowry v University of Kent: 6018012/2024
11 September 2026 · Case 6018012/2024
Whistleblowing
- SL Hamilton and Others v Verity Healthcare Ltd and ACS Care Services Ltd: 2224624/2024 and Others
13 August 2026 · Case 2224624/2024 and Others
Unlawful deduction from wages
- A Das v Woking and Sam Beare Hospice and Wellbeing Care: 6015919/2025
25 August 2026 · Case 6015919/2025
Disability discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- GH v IJ: 3306573/2024
10 August 2026 · Case 3306573/2024
Disability discrimination · Unfair dismissal
- Ms W Pietrulewicz v Mr K Tyson and Ms E Murdoch: 6026468/2026
18 August 2026 · Case 6026468/2026
Interim relief
- Mr A S Mohamed v London Underground Ltd: 3314204/2021
14 August 2026 · Case 3314204/2021
Race discrimination · Religion or belief discrimination
- Ms M Harris v British Council and Others: 3308913/2023
12 August 2026 · Case 3308913/2023
Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal
- Mr J Barnas v Tsoy Ltd: 6012004/2025
3 September 2026 · Case 6012004/2025
Sex discrimination · Unlawful deduction from wages
- Mr D Vjestica v Farsight Security Services Ltd: 6025039/2025
21 August 2026 · Case 6025039/2025
Unlawful deduction from wages
- P Cross v Carlisle Support Services Group Ltd: 6041591/2025
18 August 2026 · Case 6041591/2025
Unfair dismissal
- Mr J Edwards v Unite the Union and Mr H Beckett: 2402745/2021 and Others
11 March 2026 · Case 2402745/2021 and Others
Disability discrimination
- Miss A Munir v Sheffield City Council and Others: 1801462/2024
14 September 2026 · Case 1801462/2024
Age discrimination · Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Race discrimination · Religion or belief discrimination
- Mr E Kelly v Pantheon (UK) Ltd: 2400509/2025
13 August 2026 · Case 2400509/2025
Redundancy · Working time regulations
- Mr J Brittain v BAE Coffee Ltd: 1810298/2024
10 April 2026 · Case 1810298/2024
Breach of contract · Disability discrimination · Whistleblowing · Unfair dismissal · Unlawful deduction from wages · Working time regulations · Written pay statement
A decision is one line of the story
The register tells you that a claim was decided. It does not tell you whether the company is solvent, whether its accounts are overdue, whether it has been through insolvency, or what its directors have done elsewhere. A free CheckAFirm check adds all of that from Companies House in about a minute.
Run a free company checkQuestions people ask
Are employment tribunal decisions public?
Yes. Since 2017 every employment tribunal judgment in England, Wales and Scotland is published in a public online register run by the Ministry of Justice, and anyone can read it without an account or a fee. Names of the claimant and the employer appear in the title of the decision. Older cases, and cases settled before a hearing, will not be there.
Does a tribunal decision mean the employer lost?
No. The register contains every published judgment, including claims the employer won, claims dismissed on a technical point such as being brought out of time, preliminary rulings on procedure, and consent judgments where the parties agreed an outcome. The title alone tells you nothing about who succeeded, which is why every result here links straight to the official decision rather than being summarised.
Can I search tribunal decisions by company name?
Yes. Type the employer's name in the box above. Decision titles are free text typed by tribunal staff, so a firm can appear under a trading name, an old name, or with the Ltd left off. Search the shortest distinctive part of the name, then check the results against the company record.
Should a tribunal claim put me off using a company?
On its own, rarely. A single claim at a company with 200 staff is unremarkable, and employers win a substantial share of the claims brought against them. A pattern is different information: several claims in a short period, or claims that repeat the same subject, is worth knowing before you take a job or sign a contract. Read the decisions rather than counting them.
How far back does the register go?
The online register starts in 2017 for England and Wales and covers Scotland from the same period. Decisions before that were kept in a physical register and are not published online, so absence of a decision is not evidence that a firm has never been to a tribunal.
How do I check the company behind an employer?
Every result here has a link that runs a free CheckAFirm company check on the respondent's name. That shows the company status, age, overdue filings, insolvency history and the directors' other companies, which is the context a decision title does not give you.
Decisions are published by the Ministry of Justice and read live from the GOV.UK register. CheckAFirm does not host, edit or summarise them, and does not decide what appears there. If you believe a decision is wrong or should not be published, that is a matter for the tribunal that issued it.